The events of 2016, in particular the US election, have often left me feeling like I am living in the back-story of some movie or novel, about a dismal, Dystopian Future. Here is that back story
Sunday, February 15, 2026
where we're at
Monday, March 3, 2025
The rich are bored
The rich, the oligarchs
are incredibly bored.
So they play what-if games
with our world.
knowing that they will get through it
just fine.
Sunday, September 5, 2021
Ivermectin - horse dewormer
Who know that Horse dewormer would play such a large role in this story.
There is such distrust in the government and big pharma, that some people would rather eat horse dewormer and shit out their inside in emergency rather take the free vaccine offered by the government. The same government that is simultaneously totally incompetent buffoons and diabolical criminals. And the shelves have been emptied, and horse owners with legitimate need to deworm their horse cannot get the product. horses are scooting their butts around the fields like dogs.
and we carry on
Saturday, September 26, 2020
Supreme Court Justices, an appeal the to the Supreme Power in the land
So, Amy Coney Barrett has been nominated by Trump, to the supreme court. A young woman, early in her career, so would sit on the supreme court, presumably for a long time.
The question is, what's in it for her? Ostensibly, Trump is putting her on the supreme court, and she will be loyal to him when the question of ruling who won the 2020 election reaches the court. What's in it for her?
Once she is on the supreme court, she is on it for life. That's it. That's her reward. Paid in advance. If the question of who is the winner reaches the supreme court, she can either vote for Trump, or against. Lets examine those sides.
If she votes against Trump, meaning for Biden, Trump no longer has any hold on her. He will be prosecuted and jailed after his term is over. Trump will cry to the media about the deal they had, that she is tainted. Since he is a known liar, she can say she proved there was no deal by voting against him. She starts her career on the supreme court being forgiven by the progressive since "she voted for what was right, and voted for their guy". She can then do whatever the fuck she wants for the rest of time, never bad enough to get impeached for it.
If she votes for Trump, he gets his second term, and finishes dismantling the government, along with his minions. It won't really look like is collapsed in this first term, cause it still sorta works, but increasingly only for the rich and connected. He will model it after the Russian Oligarchies, as he loves Putin for his business sense. America could see heavy decline in rights as it spirals into dictatorship. And she will be on the bench for the entire decline, where ever it ends. History does not repeat itself, but it often rhymes. The parts of history this rhymes with all have very bad endings for the participants. History will not be kind to her.
This will be her legacy, being the judge that made laws in America irrelevant. Because in Donald Trumps dictatorship, the law will only protect the rich, and only punish the poor. And the line between the two will constantly move upward.
Maybe she's a 'True Believer'. That her cause is Righteous, and Holy, and the Ends truly justify the Means. That she sees this as her opportunity to move more rapidly to those ends. This is the scariest of all options, that America founded to be separate from religion, being ended by religion.
Her addition to the court makes it presumably a 6-3 split to the right. We have some "Survivor" level gamesmanship here. If she votes against the right, she has to be sure that at least one other of the right leaning judges will vote her way, making it a 5-4 split to the left.
Anyway, nice jawin' with y'all, she's gonna vote with Trump, and gleefully participate in the downfall of America. Because that is so 2020.
Sunday, July 19, 2020
Nothing shouts "Showtime" like a Pandemic
Ok Ok Ok
I'm stoned
The effect of climate change has always been presented, at least in the presentations that reach me, as some catastrophic change, where coastal cities like Vancouver, Seattle, New York, Miami, would be inundated and flooded out. Of course, that's silly. In reality, it more subtle, more gradual, more 'boil the frog' kind of change. Weather and seasons always oscillate, and we get a nice, long, warm summer, and the next year, cold, wet, short. A winter that has 8 weeks of -35c temperatures, and wind, then a winter that rarely hits -2, and ends around March 1.
So we expect and hope, that maybe it will be a good summer and we can have lots of BBQ's, and hope that we get a good winter, where the air doesn't hurt my face every time I go out.
What climate change is recognition that we are adding energy into the system. And we equate energy to power. The oscillation is more powerful. The hot stretches last longer. The storm season creates more powerfull storms, and more of the hurricanes and Cat 5, and more of the Tornados are F5's. The winter storms drop and larger amount of snow, we continually break records. Once in a hundred year storms and rainfalls are happening every decade.
I think it was Warren Buffer commented on 9/11 and the losses to business incurred there. "They didn't properly price the risk". They knew terrorist attacks where rising, and that the chances of an attack with catastrophic consquences were rising. But they didn't change the rates they were charging, and the insurance business lost a bunch on 9/11.
Pricing insurance for climate change could be tricky, but is there a more concrete example and edenville. The insurance (and premiums) are probably no where near enough to cover the damages, and the insurance company might take a bath, as climate change causes a once-in-a-hundred year storm to take out a bunch of dams, and flood the countryside, in the middle of a pandemic.
Climate change has to be where our change starts. The recognition that we are causing changes to weather, and we might have to change our ways. And to pay for changing our ways, we might have to tax the rich. And they were having none of that.
So here we are. A pandemic pushed up the schedule. The IDU is pushing to get right-wing govts in power around the world. There has been a campaign to break up NATO, by separating Britain from the EU. There is dictatorships in China, Russia, and the USA on the verge of becoming one. South America, and Central America and a mess of right-wing dictators, and weak lefties. Mexico might turn out a hero, but the rest our troubled. There was a valiant effort in install a right wing government in Canada, which failed. They continue to try to fracture Canada by weakening Alberta to the point of failure.
Tuesday, March 24, 2020
The passing of my Father-in-law
Birthdays and Death both suck during a pandemic.
Wednesday, March 18, 2020
Its the Economy, Stupid!
I ran today. Just a short run to try to get back to normal. It was quiet, almost no cars during a wednesday rush hour. Erie. Weird. Saw another runner, and chatted, his run was a stress reliever as well.
The economy grinds to a halt, and we realize that this is an opportunity to talk about how our economy should work. It's always easier to examine an engine when its not running with a foot pressed on the gas. Don't think that will happen. People will demand their rights. Rights to healthcare. Rights to food, and shopping. And Partying. Eventually when they are told that no, you don't have a right to healthcare, that's when the violence will start. America has never seen a problem that they couldn't solve by apply a little bit more violence. So it has to be a goto strategy here.
Tuesday, March 10, 2020
Defenders of the 2A
How long after the medical system is completely overwhelmed, until the first Defender of the 2nd Amendment demands, backed by force, that the doctors treat his loved ones. How long until the next Defender of the 2nd Amendment sees a rich person, or a politician, jump the queue, and take exception to it.
Winner gets to be more uniquely horrified that they were right.
Sunday, March 8, 2020
The oft-predicted Pandemic is now real, and has a foothold on the North American continent
Sunday, March 1, 2020
Comes a Crisis
So many world governments didn't learn the lessons on the Spanish Flu. Iran lied about how hard they were being hit. It exploded there in early March. The first deaths started happening in early March in the US as well. There was no credible plan for quarantine or containment.
When it exploded in North America, it was with a bright flash across the continent, with very little slow burn leading up to it. With the glaring incompetence of the administration in full display, panic was really the only logical course of action.
Sunday, December 1, 2019
Alberta Energy
The triumvirate now have the country locked up
Sunday, April 14, 2019
Civil War 2.0, coming to a street near you
Mueller's probe solves nothing, without men willing to enforce the law
in front of judges loyal not to the constitution, but the crown
and the coming civil war
will not be civil
Saturday, March 9, 2019
It oil, it's always oil
Sunday, February 17, 2019
It's ever more layered and complicated
that the Saudi's would hack the Amazon CEO
and use AMI/National Enquirer to attempt to blackmail
And its rumoured the Israeli's have a hand in there
Who Knew...
Sunday, April 1, 2018
The threat is Oligarchy, and perhaps not Fascism...
Rich control the media, in Fox News, and Local through Sinclair
The President and Cabinet are enriching themselves at the expense of taxpayers.
The Russians are funding disruption in order to distract and exhaust the population.
By the time Trump is finished filling judicial positions, there will be no more wins in court against companies.
who knew
they would go out,
Not with a Bang,
but a whimper
Friday, October 20, 2017
Wednesday, October 4, 2017
Twitter influence operation experiment
I started to more closely follow the 2016 elections in the late summer, and saw lots of interesting discussion about the candidates, and some certain amount of noise, for lack of a better term. There were an increasing number of accounts that made arrogant, inflammatory replies, and either refused to engage at all, or argued for a bit, then disappeared.
As the election neared, if felt like the volume of the noise kept increasing every day, and it was harder and harder to find signal. I had time to sort through it, but I imagine many or most did not, so real information was completely lost in the noise.
This experiment hopes to find a way to quiet the noise, and make twitter useful as a tool again. I will use the mute to remove these noisy accounts. My theory is that there is a limited number of accounts that create noise, and I can use mute to reduce the volume.
I initially tested the theory by adding all the muted accounts to a Twitter List, and occasionally looking at the list, and evaluate if it was pure noise. I found a contingent of accounts that hate being added to a list, and will block you immediately. This has the net effect of removing them from your public list. Didn't hurt the experiment, as either way, I was not seeing their posts. It does make lists less useful to pass the block list to others.
I start by using the Hamilton 68 dashboard http://dashboard.securingdemocracy.org/ and look at the trending hashtags. When one pops up that looks like an obvious influence operation, I look it up with Twitter search, and mute everyone using that hashtag.
The first one that I tried this with was #TotalNFLBlackout. This one was created as a result of Statements by the president regarding NFL players protesting prior to sporting events. I did not have to mute very many to make this Hashtag go silent. The next to go was #CrisisActors, created in the days after the mass murder in Las Vegas, and a much larger number of accounts got swept up in this one. Last I added #falseflag which also added a huge number.
My mute list now stands at 551 accounts. Twitter has millions, so I am not silencing many voices. So far, it has reduced the volume somewhat. Replies to relatively famous people on Twitter seem more calm, more signal, less noise.
I need a way to quantify this...
Wednesday, April 19, 2017
- Replying to @maddow2/ I want to re-up another weird and still unexplained thing that happened Friday night concerning the Pentagon.16 replies519 retweets1,303 likes
- 3/ Late on Thurs night, @TheHill posted this story about the gigantic bomb the US mil dropped in Afghanistan: http://goo.gl/oKPXsC33 replies497 retweets1,223 likes
- 4/ That article was notable for this strange, un-CENTCOM-like statement attributed to "a CENTCOM spokesman":
137 replies649 retweets1,447 likes - 5/ Then Friday, CENTCOM put out a press release saying basically, 'Uh, that wasn't us." I've never seen anything quite like this from DOD:
83 replies835 retweets1,809 likes - 6/ CENTCOM never explained who it was that gave that statement as if they were a spokesman...54 replies492 retweets1,387 likes
- 7/ (We asked, they wouldn't say).52 replies374 retweets1,269 likes
- 8/ Also, the odd "that wasn't our spokesman" release is not on the site where CENTCOM posts its press releases: http://www.centcom.mil/MEDIA/PRESS-RELEASES/ …46 replies449 retweets1,288 likes
- 9/ Also, look at the "Release Number" on the "that wasn't our spokesman" press release: 20170414-01...
57 replies491 retweets1,201 likes - 10/ There is actually a CENTCOM Press Release coded with that number... but it's a totally different thing:101 replies417 retweets1,192 likes
- 11/ So: now we've got a DOD statement that someone said things to a reporter that DOD disavows, but we don't know who the person was...75 replies413 retweets1,180 likes
- 12/ Nor do we know the circumstances of why or how someone was pretending to be a CENTCOM spokesman for a day.68 replies414 retweets1,234 likes
- 13/ And the release copping to this odd event is not publicly posted and it's coded with a release number that belongs to something else.88 replies425 retweets1,387 likes
- 14/ This is mostly just weird. But (a) I've never seen anything like it before, and (b) DOD should explain the fake spox thing. OK, done.297 replies692 retweets2,869 likes










